Skip Navigation
Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
  • Home
  • Search for Guides, Reviews, and Reports
 
 

EHC Component

  • DEcIDE Project

Topic Title

  • Addressing Knowledge Gaps in the Treatment of Hypertension Using ACE/ARB Therapies
Save this page in Facebook.com  Save this page in Myspace.com  Save this page in Twitter.com  Save this page on your Google Home Page  Save this page in Windows Live
Save this page in Yahoo  Save this page in Ask.com  Stumble this page.  Save this page in del.ico.us  Digg this page. 

E-mail To Colleague E-mail   Print This Article Print

Abstract - Draft

Addressing Knowledge Gaps in the Treatment of Hypertension Using ACE/ARB Therapies

This research is currently in progress. By joining the Effective Health Care email list, you can choose to be notified when this draft research report is available.

Topic Abstract

Hypertension is common in older persons (2 in 3 have the condition) and a major reason to see doctors and take medications. The condition poses substantial burden by increasing the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), heart failure (HF), and stroke. Commonly used two classes of drugs, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), are considered to have similar benefit and side effect profiles except for ACEI causing more cough. However, there is very little data to support the similarity of the effect on important clinical outcomes (death or cardiovascular events), especially in older patients and those with serious comorbidities. The known difference, however, is their cost. ARBs are substantially more expensive than ACEIs. We, therefore, propose to compare if one class or specific generic within the class is better than the other preventing more heart attack, HF, or stroke and/or death in older patients with hypertension who already suffer from HF, IHD, or stroke. We will use linked claims databases for the elderly in two US states and employ new user design, validated outcomes, and advanced analytic techniques to control for potential biases. The results will further be validated in subsets which are linked to clinical registries of HF, IHD, or stroke with detailed clinical information. The results will provide actionable information for patients, physicians and policy makers to make decision in uses of these drugs.

Return to Top of Page