Skip Navigation
Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
  • Home
  • Search for Research Summaries, Reviews, and Reports
 
 

EHC Component

  • EPC Project

Full Report

Related Products for this Topic

Original Nomination

For free print copies of this summary, call 800-358-9295. Ask the Publications Clearinghouse for AHRQ Publication 12-EHC105-3
Save this page in Facebook.com  Save this page in Myspace.com  Save this page in Twitter.com  Save this page on your Google Home Page  Save this page in Windows Live
Save this page in Yahoo  Save this page in Ask.com  Stumble this page.  Save this page in del.ico.us  Digg this page. 

E-mail E-mail   Print Print

Add to My Collections



Progestogens for Prevention of Preterm Birth

Clinician Summary – Sept. 21, 2012

Progestogens for Prevention of Preterm Birth

Formats

Table of Contents

Focus of Research for Clinicians

A systematic review of 63 clinical studies published from 1966 to October 2011 examined the comparative effectiveness, benefits, and adverse effects of progestogens used to prevent preterm birth in several categories of at-risk women. The full report listing all studies and the results of the analysis is available at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/pretermbirth.cfm. This summary, based on the full report of research evidence, is provided to inform discussions of options with patients and to assist in decisionmaking along with consideration of a patient’s values and preferences. However, reviews of evidence should not be construed to represent clinical recommendations or guidelines.

Background Information

Preterm births, which occur before completion of 37 weeks of pregnancy, are associated with more than 85 percent of perinatal morbidity and mortality, both maternal and infant. In the United States, 12.5 percent of live births each year are preterm, but efforts to reduce the rate have been unsuccessful.

The current clinical focus is on early intervention based on risks. In the United States, about 133,000 pregnant women per year have a history of spontaneous preterm birth and are candidates for intervention. A natural role of progesterone is to help maintain pregnancy. As evidence accrues from controlled trials, the use of progestogens (natural and synthetic progestin forms of progesterone) for women with prior preterm birth is increasingly regarded as beneficial.

Still, progestogen use for these women is limited by lack of synthesized evidence about effectiveness, optimal formulations, administration routes, doses and timing of drug delivery, modifiers of treatment effect, and a need for more data on short- and long-term risks. Also unresolved is whether other at-risk groups can benefit from progestogens.

Conclusions

Progestogens reduce the risk of preterm birth for women with prior spontaneous preterm births and current singleton pregnancies. Women with a short cervix may also benefit, but the evidence is limited. For women with multiple gestations, there is no benefit. For all other indications, the evidence is insufficient to guide care. The incidence of rare adverse events and the effects of modifiers are unknown, and direct comparisons of progestogen formulations, doses, timing, and durations of use have not been made. The evidence is insufficient to know whether progestogen use prevents morbidity or promotes normal childhood development.

Clinical Bottom Line

Benefits

By Indication (Risk Group)

By Formulation/Route of Administration

  • When assessed by routes of administration alone (injected, oral, and vaginal), all formulations reduce the risk of preterm birth, but none reduce neonatal mortality rates. (Strength of evidence not rated)
  • Without head-to-head trials, the evidence is insufficient to determine if formulation and administration route are associated with different maternal or fetal outcomes or adverse effects. evidence insufficient
Adverse Effects

Safety of Progestogens


*NNT = number needed to treat: the number of patients to be treated to find the effect in one patient more than in the control group
NICU = neonatal intensive care unit

Strength of Evidence Scale

evidence high

High confidence that the evidence reflects the true effect. Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

evidence medium

Moderate confidence that the evidence reflects the true effect. Further research may change our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

evidence low

Low confidence that the evidence reflects the true effect. Further research is likely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

evidence insufficient

Evidence is either unavailable or does not permit a conclusion.

Gaps in Knowledge

What To Discuss With Your Patients

  • Progestogens reduce the risk of preterm birth for women who previously had a spontaneous preterm birth and who currently have a singleton pregnancy. Women with a short cervix may also benefit. Progestogens do not prevent preterm birth for twin or triplet gestations.
  • There is little evidence about using progestogens for women with preterm labor or other risk factors for preterm birth.
  • The evidence about differences between the oral, injection, or vaginal methods for treatment is limited.
  • It is not known if progestogens will provide short- or long-term benefits to the infant or pregnant woman, other than delaying birth, and there is little evidence about short- and long-term adverse effects.

Resource for Patients

Progestogens To Prevent Preterm Birth, A Review of the Research About Progestogens for Women at Risk is a free companion to this clinician research summary. It covers:

  • The ability of progestogens to reduce the risk of preterm birth for some at-risk women
  • The types of progestogens that are used
  • The limited evidence about short- and long-term benefits and adverse effects

Source

The information in this summary is based on Progestogens for Prevention of Preterm Birth, Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 74, prepared by the Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10065-I for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, August 2012. Available at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/pretermbirth.cfm.

This summary was prepared by the John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. It was written by Diane Markesich, Ph.D., Thomas Workman, Ph.D., Kjersti Aagaard-Tillery, M.D., and Michael Fordis, M.D.

Return to Top of Page