Comparative Effectiveness of Nonoperative and Operative Treatments for Rotator Cuff Tears
Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Techniques for Rotator Cuff Tears
For all patient groups, regardless of technique, there were significant improvements in the postoperative functional, pain, and range-of-motion outcome measures when compared to preoperative scores. However, few of the techniques demonstrated clinically important differences between their respective groups on any of the postoperative measures; six studies comparing single-row vs. double-row repairs documented moderate evidence for statistical equivalence in function and cuff integrity. There was moderate evidence for no difference in cuff integrity between mattress locking and simple stitch. The evidence was too limited to make conclusions about the other techniques.
- Seida J, Schouten JR, Mousavi SS, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Nonoperative and Operative Treatments for Rotator Cuff Tears, Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 22 (Prepared by University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0023). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; July 2010. AHRQ Publication No. 10-EHC050.
Your slide tray is being processed.