Powered by the Evidence-based Practice Centers
Evidence Reports All of EHC
Evidence Reports All of EHC

SHARE:

FacebookTwitterFacebookPrintShare

MRI versus 3D Ultrasoud in diagnosis of Mullerian anomalies

NOMINATED TOPIC | January 9, 2017
Briefly describe a specific question, or set of related questions, about a health care test or treatment that this program should consider.

MRI versus 3D Ultrasoud in diagnosis of Mullerian anomalies

Describe why this topic is important.

To know which modality to ask for those cases

How will an answer to your research question be used or help inform decisions for you or your group?

If both have the same accuracy, 3D is cheaper available and less invasive , I will choose it as first tool for diagnosis

Other Information About You: (optional)
Please choose a description that best describes your role or perspective: (you may select more than one category if appropriate)
Prof of Obgyn
If you are you making a suggestion on behalf of an organization, please state the name of the organization
 
Please tell us how you heard about the Effective Health Care Program
Mahmoud Abdelnaby . Egypt, Alex
Page last reviewed November 2017
Page originally created January 2017

Internet Citation: MRI versus 3D Ultrasoud in diagnosis of Mullerian anomalies. Content last reviewed November 2017. Effective Health Care Program, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/get-involved/nominated-topics/mri-versus-3d-ultrasoud-in-diagnosis-of-mullerian-anomalies

Select to copy citation