- Briefly describe a specific question, or set of related questions, about a health care test or treatment that this program should consider.
uncruspurous medical malpractice
- Does your question include a comparison of different health care approaches? (If no, your topic will still be considered.)
yes
- If yes, explain the specific technologies, devices, drugs, or interventions you would like to see compared:
prostate biopsies and mammograms
- What patients or group(s) of patients does your question apply to? (Please include specific details such as age range, gender, coexisting diagnoses, and indications for therapy.)
General public
- Are there subgroups of patients that your question might apply to? (For example, an ethnic group, stage or severity of a disease.)
- Describe the health-related benefits you are interested in. (For example, improvements in patient symptoms or problems from treatment or diagnosis.)
Doctors must be more sensitive to the patient rather than looking for money
- Describe any health-related risks, side effects, or harms that you are concerned about.
I have verified that many doctors do not read test reports, do not keep properly their medical records and do not report test results to doctors who requested them. Who controls these shortcomings? What is the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force doing to prevent health damages due to these medical shortcomings? There are people who do not trust the American medical system and believe that there is a conspiracy against the public. Certainly the American Society of Urologists had conspired about prostate cancer to make more money with unnecessary prostate biopsies. Probably it is the same with unnecessary mammograms. There are people who believe that doctors refuse to prescribe medicines so the sick person becomes more ill and must go more times to see the doctor. Why doctors do not want that we read the Internet? Can we read medical books in public libraries? What does the AHRQ do to protect the public from unscrupulous medical procedures and treatments as well as false diagnosis in order to make more money?
Appropriateness for EHC Program
- Does your question include a health care drug, intervention, device, or technology available (or likely to be available) in the U.S.?
yes
- Which priority area(s) and population(s) does this topic apply to? (check all that apply)
-
- EHC Priority Conditions (updated in 2008)
- Arthritis and nontraumatic joint disorders
- Cancer
- Cardiovascular disease, including stroke and hypertension
- Dementia, including Alzheimer's disease
- Depression and other mental health disorders
- Developmental delays, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism
- Diabetes mellitus
- Functional limitations and disability
- Infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS
- Obesity
- Peptic ulcer disease and dyspepsia
- Pregnancy, including preterm birth
- Pulmonary disease/asthma
- Substance abuse
- AHRQ Priority Populations
- Low income groups
- Minority groups
- Women
- Children
- Elderly
- Individuals with special health care needs, including individuals with disabilities or who need chronic care or end-of-life health care
- Federal Health Care Program
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
Importance
- Describe why this topic is important.
Health Care is calamitous in USA.
- What specifically motivated you to ask this question? (For example, you are developing a clinical guideline, working with a policy with large uncertainty about the appropriate approach, costly intervention, new research you have read, items in the media you may have seen, a clinical practice dilemma you know of, etc.)
I might need to make a Lawsuit for malpractice. My doctors are indifferent and cruel towards my medical problem as result of an eye cataract operation.
- Does your question represent uncertainty for clinicians and/or policy-makers? (For example, variations in clinical care, controversy in what constitutes appropriate clinical care, or a policy decision.)
yes
- If yes, please explain:
Extreme disagreements in diagnosis and recommended treatment.
Potential Impact
- How will an answer to your research question be used or help inform decisions for you or your group?
Will save LIFES.
- Describe the timeframe in which an answer to your question is needed.
As soon as possible the betterDangerous
- Describe any health disparities, inequities, or impact on vulnerable populations your question applies to.
Dangerous health hazards due to poor medical service from uscrupulous doctors.
Nominator Information
- Other Information About You: (optional)
-
- Please choose a description that best describes your role or perspective: (you may select more than one category if appropriate)
Will save LIFES.
- Are you making a suggestion as an individual or on behalf of an organization?
Individual
- Please tell us how you heard about the Effective Health Care Program
Internet