Powered by the Evidence-based Practice Centers
Evidence Reports All of EHC
Evidence Reports All of EHC

SHARE:

FacebookTwitterFacebookPrintShare

What are the benefits and risks of using functional status and health-related quality of life as health outcomes for quality indicators for the elderly and patients with multiple comorbid conditions? Potential benefits could include…

Briefly describe a specific question, or set of related questions, about a health care test or treatment that this program should consider.

What are the benefits and risks of using functional status and health-related quality of life as health outcomes for quality indicators for the elderly and patients with multiple comorbid conditions? Potential benefits could include evidence for improved outcomes and quality of care with use of these quality indicators; potential harms include patient burden, incomplete reporting and data, and adverse patient selection by physicians due to the difficulty of impacting these outcomes.

Describe why this topic is important.

Adapted from the JAGS article attached:

Although functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are important outcomes for people with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) and are currently being developed by several key stakeholders, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. However, evidence is unclear on the use of quality indicators for functional status and HRQOL that would be relevant for populations with MCCs. The indicators that exist are used for specific populations or settings and have problems with feasibility and usability. Although a recent systematic review addressed evidence to support interventions for improving QOL and functional status, this review could not be applied to the issue of quality measurement. It is unclear

whether measuring HRQOL and functional status, or implementing quality indicators using these tools, affects patient status or quality of care. Measurement tools for functional status may not capture the effect of interventions aimed at preventing or ameliorating functional decline. Furthermore, the evidence base may not be sufficiently robust for endorsement of indicators that hold providers accountable for preventing or reversing functional decline in populations of older adults with MCCs in the ambulatory setting. Dedicated research is needed to systematically evaluate usability and feasibility of implementing quality indicators.

How will an answer to your research question be used or help inform decisions for you or your group?

This will help organizations and national quality groups better understand what evidence supports improvement in quality for patients with multiple chronic conditions.

Other Information About You: (optional)
Please choose a description that best describes your role or perspective: (you may select more than one category if appropriate)
Physician
If you are you making a suggestion on behalf of an organization, please state the name of the organization
Please tell us how you heard about the Effective Health Care Program
Page last reviewed November 2017
Page originally created May 2014

Internet Citation: What are the benefits and risks of using functional status and health-related quality of life as health outcomes for quality indicators for the elderly and patients with multiple comorbid conditions? Potential benefits could include…. Content last reviewed November 2017. Effective Health Care Program, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/get-involved/nominated-topics/what-are-the-benefits-and-risks-of-using-functional-status-and-health-related-quality-of-life-as-health-outcomes-for-quality-indicators-for-the-elderly-and-patients-with-multiple-comorbid-conditions-potential-benefits-could-

Select to copy citation