Powered by the Evidence-based Practice Centers
Evidence Reports All of EHC
Evidence Reports All of EHC

SHARE:

FacebookTwitterFacebookPrintShare

What are the comparative safety and effectiveness of noninvasive and invasive strategies in the management of patients with chronic stable angina?

NOMINATED TOPIC | February 27, 2012
Briefly describe a specific question, or set of related questions, about a health care test or treatment that this program should consider.

What are the comparative safety and effectiveness of noninvasive and invasive strategies in the management of patients with chronic stable angina?

Does your question include a comparison of different health care approaches? (If no, your topic will still be considered.)

yes

If yes, explain the specific technologies, devices, drugs, or interventions you would like to see compared:

Beta blockers versus nitrates versus calcium channel blockers versus ranolazine versus exercise programs versus versus coronary stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting versus intraaortic balloon counterpulsation

What patients or group(s) of patients does your question apply to? (Please include specific details such as age range, gender, coexisting diagnoses, and indications for therapy.)

All patients with chronic stable angina

Are there subgroups of patients that your question might apply to? (For example, an ethnic group, stage or severity of a disease.)

Patients with angina and concomitant heart failure, patients aged 65 years or greater

Describe the health-related benefits you are interested in. (For example, improvements in patient symptoms or problems from treatment or diagnosis.)

All patient-related benefits, including but not limited to: improved quality of life, decreased mortality, decreased hospitalizations

Describe any health-related risks, side effects, or harms that you are concerned about.

All patient-related harms, including but not limited to: increased mortality, increased hospitalizations, development of heart failure

Appropriateness for EHC Program

Does your question include a health care drug, intervention, device, or technology available (or likely to be available) in the U.S.?

yes

Which priority area(s) and population(s) does this topic apply to? (check all that apply)
EHC Priority Conditions (updated in 2008)
  • Cardiovascular disease, including stroke and hypertension
AHRQ Priority Populations
  • Minority groups
  • Women
  • Elderly
  • Individuals with special health care needs, including individuals with disabilities or who need chronic care or end-of-life health care
Federal Health Care Program
  • Medicaid
  • Medicare

Importance

Describe why this topic is important.

Three main pharmacotherapies – beta blockers, nitrates, and calcium channel blockers – have remained the mainstay of antianginal therapy. While nitrates may have diminished efficacy over the long term due to tachyphylaxis, they are often included as a component of a regimen for patients with chronic stable angina. The comparative effectiveness of newer agents, such as ranolazine, either as a substitute for or an addition to these agents, is unknown. Similarly, effectiveness studies are needed that compare these agents with more conservative strategies (e.g. exercise programs) and more invasive strategies (e.g. coronary stents, coronary artery bypass grafting, intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation). Strategies may differ in elderly patients who may have atypical angina, have been underrepresented in clinical trials, and often have more comorbidities. As such, patients aged 65 years or greater represent a particular subgroup of interest.

What specifically motivated you to ask this question? (For example, you are developing a clinical guideline, working with a policy with large uncertainty about the appropriate approach, costly intervention, new research you have read, items in the media you may have seen, a clinical practice dilemma you know of, etc.)

This topic was ranked as a priority by a panel of stakeholders convened through the Duke EPC’s Cardiovascular Topic Identification project to recommend a research agenda for future systematic reviews within the EHC cardiovascular domain.

Does your question represent uncertainty for clinicians and/or policy-makers? (For example, variations in clinical care, controversy in what constitutes appropriate clinical care, or a policy decision.)

yes

If yes, please explain:

Stakeholders considered uncertainty for clinicians and/or policy-makers as part of the ranking process, and with that criterion considered, this topic received a priority designation.

Potential Impact

How will an answer to your research question be used or help inform decisions for you or your group?

This topic was identified by a group of stakeholders in cardiovascular disease as an area in which significant morbidity, mortality, and/or variation in resource utilization persists, and future systematic review development should be prioritized. Answers to this question are expected to inform practice and guideline development, and ultimately improve the quality of care by reducing morbidity, mortality, and costs.

Describe the timeframe in which an answer to your question is needed.

Though no specific timeframe is applicable, this topic was identified by the stakeholder group as immediately relevant.

Describe any health disparities, inequities, or impact on vulnerable populations your question applies to.

Stakeholders considered variation in clinical practice and inequities in care as part of the ranking process, and with that criterion considered, this topic received a priority designation.

Nominator Information

Other Information About You: (optional)
Please choose a description that best describes your role or perspective: (you may select more than one category if appropriate)

This topic was identified by a group of stakeholders in cardiovascular disease as an area in which significant morbidity, mortality, and/or variation in resource utilization persists, and future systematic review development should be prioritized. Answers to this question are expected to inform practice and guideline development, and ultimately improve the quality of care by reducing morbidity, mortality, and costs.

Are you making a suggestion as an individual or on behalf of an organization?

Organization

Please tell us how you heard about the Effective Health Care Program

Involvement in the Evidence-based Practice Center Program

Page last reviewed November 2017
Page originally created February 2012

Internet Citation: What are the comparative safety and effectiveness of noninvasive and invasive strategies in the management of patients with chronic stable angina?. Content last reviewed November 2017. Effective Health Care Program, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/get-involved/nominated-topics/what-are-the-comparative-safety-and-effectiveness-of-noninvasive-and-invasive-strategies-in-the-management-of-patients-with-chronic-stable-angina

Select to copy citation